[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100504041657.GC13686@1wt.eu>
Date: Tue, 4 May 2010 06:16:57 +0200
From: Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
Cc: Thomas Renninger <trenn@...e.de>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
mingo@...e.hu, peterz@...radead.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
davej@...hat.com, cpufreq@...r.kernel.org, riel@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/7] cpufreq: make the iowait-is-busy-time a sysfs
tunable
On Mon, May 03, 2010 at 08:48:18PM -0700, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>
> Subject: [PATCH] cpufreq: make the iowait-is-busy-time a sysfs tunable
>
> Pavel Machek pointed out that not all CPUs have an efficient idle
> at high frequency. Specifically, older Intel and various AMD cpus
> would get a higher power usage when copying files from USB.
>
> Mike Chan pointed out that the same is true for various ARM chips
> as well.
>
> Thomas Renninger suggested to make this a sysfs tunable with a
> reasonable default.
>
> This patch adds a sysfs tunable for the new behavior, and uses
> a very simple function to determine a reasonable default, depending
> on the CPU vendor/type.
>
> Signed-off-by: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>
> ---
That's very nice Arjan. That way we'll be able to select between
performance and power savings, which is what most laptop users
want after all !
Thanks,
Willy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists