[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201005040842.35260.oneukum@suse.de>
Date: Tue, 4 May 2010 08:42:35 +0200
From: Oliver Neukum <oneukum@...e.de>
To: linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Cc: Bruno Prémont <bonbons@...ux-vserver.org>,
Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>, USB@...p1.linux-foundation.org,
list <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
Kernel development list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [linux-pm] s2ram slow (radeon) / failing (usb)
Am Montag, 3. Mai 2010 23:11:54 schrieb Bruno Prémont:
> [ 477.543304] usb 1-2.1: usb_autosuspend_device: cnt 1 -> 0
> [ 477.543316] usbhid 1-2.1:1.1: __pm_runtime_suspend()!
> [ 477.543326] usbhid 1-2.1:1.1: __pm_runtime_suspend() returns 0!
> [ 477.543380] usbcore: registered new interface driver usbhid
> [ 477.549457] usbhid: USB HID core driver
>
> And suspend is freezing inside of hid_cancel_delayed_stuff(usbhid) call
> from hid_suspend() in drivers/hid/usbhid/hid-core.c ...
>
> Is it worth continuing iteration and adding further printk's down there?
> Jiri, what's your opinion on this?
Ugh. That looks like a bug in usbhid that I introduced. A fix is not trivial.
In short, I did not think the device could be undergoing a queued resumption
while suspend() is being called. I wonder why this is happening.
Regards
Oliver
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists