[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 05 May 2010 11:37:58 +0200
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
CC: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>, mingo@...e.hu,
efault@....de, avi@...hat.com, paulus@...ba.org, acme@...hat.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/12] perf: add perf_event_task_migrate()
On 05/05/2010 11:11 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-05-05 at 07:08 +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
>>
>> In fact why not moving both tracing calls under this check.
>> This is going to fix the migrate trace event that gets called
>> even on "spurious" migrations, and you avoid the duplicate check
>> in the perf callback.
>
> I kept the tracepoint out of that because I wanted to see how often it
> attempts silly migrations :-)
Do you still need to keep it or is it okay to move it under the
silliness check?
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists