[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 05 May 2010 11:14:03 +0100
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@...app.com>
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...e.hu,
laijs@...fujitsu.com, dipankar@...ibm.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca,
josh@...htriplett.org, dvhltc@...ibm.com, niv@...ibm.com,
tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org, rostedt@...dmis.org,
Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu, eric.dumazet@...il.com,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 36/48] nfs: __rcu annotations
Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> struct nfs_delegation {
> struct list_head super_list;
> - struct rpc_cred *cred;
> + struct rpc_cred __rcu *cred;
> struct inode *inode;
> nfs4_stateid stateid;
> fmode_t type;
That's unnecessary. I posted a patch that removed the usage of RCU on that
pointer:
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 11:26:13 +0100
Subject: NFS: Fix RCU issues in the NFSv4 delegation code
Did Trond take it?
David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists