[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 5 May 2010 16:32:49 +0100
From: Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>
To: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>,
Adam Litke <agl@...ibm.com>, Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix count_vm_event preempt in memory compaction direct
reclaim
On Wed, May 05, 2010 at 05:25:31PM +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> On Wed, May 05, 2010 at 04:14:39PM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > How about the following as an alternative to dropp migrate_prep?
>
> Yep this is what I'd like too... btw in the comments you also mention
> IPI but I guess that's ok.
It was an oversight. I've corrected it now.
> About the cost I'm not sure but I would
> expect the cost of this to be even higher because it also has to run
> the scheduler unlike a real IPI.
>
Fair point. I wouldn't be too sure what the relative costs are but either
way it's bad and unnecessary in the case of compaction.
--
Mel Gorman
Part-time Phd Student Linux Technology Center
University of Limerick IBM Dublin Software Lab
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists