[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100505210121.GC2439@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 5 May 2010 14:01:21 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@...app.com>
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
mingo@...e.hu, laijs@...fujitsu.com, dipankar@...ibm.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca,
josh@...htriplett.org, dvhltc@...ibm.com, niv@...ibm.com,
tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org, rostedt@...dmis.org,
Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu, eric.dumazet@...il.com,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 36/48] nfs: __rcu annotations
On Wed, May 05, 2010 at 08:44:55AM -0400, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-05-05 at 11:14 +0100, David Howells wrote:
> > Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> >
> > > struct nfs_delegation {
> > > struct list_head super_list;
> > > - struct rpc_cred *cred;
> > > + struct rpc_cred __rcu *cred;
> > > struct inode *inode;
> > > nfs4_stateid stateid;
> > > fmode_t type;
> >
> > That's unnecessary. I posted a patch that removed the usage of RCU on that
> > pointer:
> >
> > Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 11:26:13 +0100
> > Subject: NFS: Fix RCU issues in the NFSv4 delegation code
> >
> > Did Trond take it?
> >
> > David
>
> Yes. I haven't pushed it to Linus yet, but I'm planning to do so in the
> next 2 days.
I have dropped this change from this commit. Are the rest of the changes
in this commit (nfs_fs.h and auth_gss.h) OK?
Thanx, Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists