[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 05 May 2010 08:14:42 +0300
From: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@...il.com>
To: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
Cc: linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Kevin Cernekee <kpc.mtd@...il.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...ia.com>,
Dmitry Pervushin <dpervushin@...eddedalley.com>,
Roel Kluin <roel.kluin@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ubi: init even if mtd device cannot be attached, if
built into kernel
On Wed, 2010-05-05 at 08:12 +0300, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_MTD_UBI_MODULE
> > +static inline int ubi_is_module(void) { return 1; }
> > +#else
> > +static inline int ubi_is_module(void) { return 0; }
> > +#endif
>
> I really hate these ifdefs. Dunno why, but they feel disgusting.
>
> I understand your issue and agree that is should be fixed. And I cannot
> really see a better solution. So if no-one complains, I'll accept your
> patch.
>
> However, for consistency with other UBI code (see debug.h), please, do
> this like
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_MTD_UBI_MODULE
> #define ubi_is_module() 1
> #else
> #define ubi_is_module() 1
> #endif
Err, of course the second one should be 0, not 1. I can actually do this
modification myself, or you can re-send your patch.
--
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy (Артём Битюцкий)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists