[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <z2p427d64721005060202g2da71211j38b21416b69fcb94@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 6 May 2010 17:02:39 +0800
From: Axel Lin <axel.lin@...il.com>
To: Liam Girdwood <lrg@...mlogic.co.uk>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] mc13783-regulator: fix vaild voltage range
checking for mc13783_fixed_regulator_set_voltage
hi Liam,
2010/5/6 Liam Girdwood <lrg@...mlogic.co.uk>:
> On Thu, 2010-05-06 at 11:33 +0800, Axel Lin wrote:
>> In the case of "min_uV == max_uV == mc13783_regulators[id].voltages[0]",
>> mc13783_fixed_regulator_set_voltage should return 0 instead of -EINVAL.
>>
>> This patch also adds a missing ">" character for MODULE_AUTHOR, a trivial fix.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@...il.com>
>> Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
>> Cc: Liam Girdwood <lrg@...mlogic.co.uk>
>> ---
>> drivers/regulator/mc13783-regulator.c | 6 +++---
>> 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>
> Both patches look the same. Is there any reason for the resend ?
I just found my mail client make the first patch not able to be
cleanly applied by git-am.
The resend one fix it, and should be cleanly applied by git-am command.
Regards,
Axel
>
> Thanks
>
> Liam
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists