[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4BE2C6E8.2030609@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 06 May 2010 09:40:56 -0400
From: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm,migration: Prevent rmap_walk_[anon|ksm] seeing
the wrong VMA information
On 05/05/2010 01:34 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> - you always lock the _deepest_ anon_vma you can find.
The emphasis should be on "always" :)
> That means just a single lock. And the "deepest" anon_vma is well-defined
> for all anon_vma's, because each same_anon_vma chain is always rooted in
> the original anon_vma that caused it.
It should work, but only if we always take the deepest
anon_vma lock.
Not just in the migration code, but also in mmap, munmap,
mprotect (for split_vma), expand_stack, etc...
Otherwise we will still not provide exclusion of migrate
vs. those events.
I'm guessing that means changing both anon_vma_lock and
page_lock_anon_vma to always take the deepest anon_vma
lock - not introducing a new function that is only called
by the migration code.
--
All rights reversed
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists