lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <y2m1b68c6791005070103q8cabf3afx22af4a28c6ecf747@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 7 May 2010 17:03:38 +0900
From:	jassi brar <jassisinghbrar@...il.com>
To:	Nitin Gupta <ngupta@...are.org>
Cc:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
	Hugh Dickins <hugh.dickins@...cali.co.uk>,
	Cyp <cyp561@...il.com>, Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] Add flag to identify block swap devices

On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 4:25 PM, Nitin Gupta <ngupta@...are.org> wrote:
> Added SWP_BLKDEV flag to distinguish block and regular file backed
> swap devices. We could also check if a swap is entire block device,
> rather than a file, by:
> S_ISBLK(swap_info_struct->swap_file->f_mapping->host->i_mode)
> but, I think, simply checking this flag is more convenient.
This might make it convenient for now but is likely to increase complexity and
redundancy. Why not define a macro/inline to figure that out?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ