linux-kernel - Re: [RFC] perf_events: ctx_flexible_sched

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1273221878.1642.320.camel@laptop>
Date:	Fri, 07 May 2010 10:44:38 +0200
From:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc:	Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, mingo@...e.hu,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [RFC] perf_events: ctx_flexible_sched_in() not maximizing PMU
 utilization

On Fri, 2010-05-07 at 10:25 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> We are however still fully greedy, which is still O(n), which we don't
> want. However if we stop being greedy and use the same heuristic we do
> now, stop filling the PMU at the first fail, we'll still be fair,
> because the algorithm ensures that.
> 
FWIW the non-greedy algorithm is O(m * log(n)), where m is the number of
counters on the PMU and n the number of competing events, since m is
pretty much a constant, we can say the full algorithm is O(log n).



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/