[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1005071829470.3401@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Fri, 7 May 2010 18:30:54 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
cc: Darren Hart <dvhltc@...ibm.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
"Peter W. Morreale" <pmorreale@...ell.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@...ell.com>,
Sven-Thorsten Dietrich <sdietrich@...ell.com>,
Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com>,
John Cooper <john.cooper@...rd-harmonic.com>,
Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>,
Ulrich Drepper <drepper@...il.com>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] futex: Add FUTEX_LOCK with optional adaptive
spinning
On Fri, 7 May 2010, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-05-07 at 18:20 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > + if (!owner->oncpu)
>
> can't do that, that relies on __ARCH_WANT_UNLOCKED_CTXSW
Grr, yes.
> Please keep the code as near mutex_spin_on_owner() as possible.
There is no reason why we can't make that unconditional.
Thanks,
tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists