[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1273252837.3542.30.camel@c-dwalke-linux.qualcomm.com>
Date: Fri, 07 May 2010 10:20:37 -0700
From: Daniel Walker <dwalker@...o99.com>
To: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg@...hat.com>,
Brian Swetland <swetland@...gle.com>,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
mark gross <mgross@...ux.intel.com>, markgross@...gnar.org,
Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
Kernel development list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Linux-pm mailing list <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH 1/8] PM: Add suspend block api.
On Thu, 2010-05-06 at 19:00 -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> Oh some SoC devices like omap hit retention or off modes in the idle loop.
> That brings down the idle consumption of a running system to minimal
> levels. It's basically the same as suspending the device in every idle loop.
>
> The system wakes up every few seconds or so, but that already provides
> battery life of over ten days or so on an idle system. Of course the
> wakeup latencies are in milliseconds then.
MSM doesn't have those power states unfortunately .. Your kind of
suggesting what I was suggesting in that we should suspend in idle. Your
hardware can do it easier tho since your have power states that are
equal to suspend.
Daniel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists