[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100507173621.GA23604@srcf.ucam.org>
Date: Fri, 7 May 2010 18:36:21 +0100
From: Matthew Garrett <mjg@...hat.com>
To: Daniel Walker <dwalker@...o99.com>
Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
Brian Swetland <swetland@...gle.com>,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
mark gross <mgross@...ux.intel.com>, markgross@...gnar.org,
Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
Kernel development list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Linux-pm mailing list <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH 1/8] PM: Add suspend block api.
On Fri, May 07, 2010 at 10:20:37AM -0700, Daniel Walker wrote:
> MSM doesn't have those power states unfortunately .. Your kind of
> suggesting what I was suggesting in that we should suspend in idle. Your
> hardware can do it easier tho since your have power states that are
> equal to suspend.
If your wakeup latencies are sufficiently low and you have fine-grained
enough control over your hardware then suspend in idle is a reasonable
thing to do - but if you have a userspace app that's spinning then
that doesn't solve the issue.
--
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@...f.ucam.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists