[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100507193353.GA27175@srcf.ucam.org>
Date: Fri, 7 May 2010 20:33:53 +0100
From: Matthew Garrett <mjg@...hat.com>
To: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
Cc: Daniel Walker <dwalker@...o99.com>,
Brian Swetland <swetland@...gle.com>,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
mark gross <mgross@...ux.intel.com>, markgross@...gnar.org,
Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
Kernel development list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Linux-pm mailing list <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH 1/8] PM: Add suspend block api.
On Fri, May 07, 2010 at 12:28:37PM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Daniel Walker <dwalker@...o99.com> [100507 12:01]:
> > On Fri, 2010-05-07 at 19:46 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > > Freezer cgroups would work better, but it doesn't really change the
> > > point - if that application has an open network socket, how do you know
> > > to resume that application when a packet comes in?
>
> No idea, but that still sounds a better situation to me than
> trying to deal with that for a suspended system! :)
Suspend blocks deal with that problem. Nobody has yet demonstrated a
workable alternative solution.
--
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@...f.ucam.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists