[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100507034554.GB20935@thegnar.org>
Date: Thu, 6 May 2010 20:45:54 -0700
From: mgross <markgross@...gnar.org>
To: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg@...hat.com>,
Brian Swetland <swetland@...gle.com>,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
mark gross <mgross@...ux.intel.com>, markgross@...gnar.org,
Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
Kernel development list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Linux-pm mailing list <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH 1/8] PM: Add suspend block api.
On Thu, May 06, 2010 at 10:14:53AM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Matthew Garrett <mjg@...hat.com> [100506 10:05]:
> > On Thu, May 06, 2010 at 10:01:51AM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> >
> > > Or are you suspending constantly, tens of times per minute even if
> > > there's no user activity?
> >
> > In this case you'd be repeatedly trying to suspend until the modem
> > driver stopped blocking it. It's pretty much a waste.
>
> But then the userspace knows you're getting data from the modem, and
> it can kick some inactivity timer that determines when to try to
> suspend next.
Thank you for thinking.
--mgross
>
> Why would you need to constantly try to suspend in that case?
>
> Regards,
>
> Tony
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists