linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] fs: add fincore(2) (mincore(2) for file descriptors)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 8 May 2010 00:46:37 +0200
From:	Cédric Villemain 
	<cedric.villemain.debian@...il.com>
To:	Andy Isaacson <adi@...apodia.org>
Cc:	Chris Frost <chris@...stnet.net>, Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
	Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
	Benny Halevy <bhalevy@...asas.com>, Andrew@...stfloor.org,
	linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Steve VanDeBogart <vandebo-lkml@...dbox.net>,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs: add fincore(2) (mincore(2) for file descriptors)

2010/2/21 Andy Isaacson <adi@...apodia.org>:
> On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 10:13:12AM -0800, Chris Frost wrote:
>> Add the fincore() system call. fincore() is mincore() for file descriptors.
>>
>> The functionality of fincore() can be emulated with an mmap(), mincore(),
>> and munmap(), but this emulation requires more system calls and requires
>> page table modifications. fincore() can provide a significant performance
>> improvement for non-sequential in-core queries.
>
> In addition to being expensive, mmap/mincore/munmap perturb the VM's
> eviction algorithm -- a page is less likely to be evicted if it's
> mmapped when being considered for eviction.
>
> I frequently see this happen when using mincore(1) from
> http://bitbucket.org/radii/mincore/ -- "watch mincore -v *.big" while
> *.big are being sequentially read results in a significant number of
> pages remaining in-core, whereas if I only run mincore after the
> sequential read is complete, the large files will be nearly-completely
> out of core (except for the tail of the last file, of course).
>
> It's very interesting to watch
> % watch --interval=.5 mincore -v *
>
> while an IO-intensive process is happening, such as mke2fs on a
> filesystem image.
>
> So, I support the addition of fincore(2) and would use it if it were
> merged.

I wonder what the actual state is for this proposition?
I'd like to see fincore(2) added too...

>
> -andy
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>



-- 
Cédric Villemain
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/