linux-kernel - Re: RFC - Cleaned up hypervisor layer

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20100507230210.GB24877@kroah.com>
Date:	Fri, 7 May 2010 16:02:10 -0700
From:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Ky Srinivasan <ksrinivasan@...ell.com>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Hank Janssen <hjanssen@...rosoft.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Alok Kataria <akataria@...are.com>
Subject: Re: RFC - Cleaned up hypervisor layer

On Fri, May 07, 2010 at 03:43:04PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> This patch implements a cleaned up hypervisor layer, plus cleans up some
> of the aspects of both Hank's MS-HyperV patch and the existing VMware
> driver.  In particular, the MS-HyperV information is private
> information, per system, not per CPU, and can thus simply be stored in
> an ordinary global variable.  This also turns the hypervisor detection
> into an information structure instead of just an identifier.

This looks great to me, thanks for doing this work.

As this is a diff on top of my previous patch, do you want me to merge
it in with it and resend it, or will you?

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/