linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] [RFC] get_maintainer.pl: only list maintainers by default

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4BE5F286.1020503@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
Date:	Sun, 09 May 2010 01:23:50 +0200
From:	Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>
To:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
CC:	florian@...kler.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [RFC] get_maintainer.pl: only list maintainers by default

Joe Perches wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-05-08 at 23:39 +0200, florian@...kler.org wrote:
>> If scm meta-information is used, only list people that signed-off or
>> acked or reviewed the code in question.
>>
>> after all it's called get_maintainer.pl and not
>> get_random_people_to_look_at_the_code.pl
> 
> Anyone that actually signs a patch is not "random".

Reported-by and tested-by signatures in the git history commit /are/ in
fact random WRT getting a list of handlers/ reviewers of a new patch. It
is more likely that reporters and testers cannot or/and do not want to
do anything about such a patch.  Such a mailing is called UBE.
-- 
Stefan Richter
-=====-==-=- -=-= -=--=
http://arcgraph.de/sr/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/