linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -tip] x86,perf: P4 PMU -- protect sensible procedures from preemption

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20100508080640.GE2825@elte.hu>
Date:	Sat, 8 May 2010 10:06:40 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...nvz.org>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -tip] x86,perf: P4 PMU -- protect sensible procedures
 from preemption


* Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...nvz.org> wrote:

>  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_p4.c |    8 +++++---
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

Looks good - but it doesnt apply cleanly to tip:master:

 Hunk #3 succeeded at 828 with fuzz 2 (offset 373 lines).
 Hunk #4 FAILED at 743.
 1 out of 4 hunks FAILED -- rejects in file arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_p4.c

is there some other patch dependency?

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/