[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <i2ubd0d95d71005080156z7bf1b34bh2a15532813ae7cec@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 8 May 2010 16:56:47 +0800
From: Steven Liu <lingjiujianke@...il.com>
To: Nigel Cunningham <nigel@...onice.net>
Cc: Linus WALLEIJ <linus.walleij@...ricsson.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Check kmalloc return value before use the buffer
[Linus WALLEIJ]
can this patch fix in?
2010/5/8 Nigel Cunningham <nigel@...onice.net>:
> Hi again.
>
> On 08/05/10 04:57, Linus WALLEIJ wrote:
>>
>> [Steven]
>>
>>> the code in arch/arm/mach-u300/dummyspichip.c is
>>>
>>> bigtxbuf_virtual = kmalloc(DMA_TEST_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
>>> if (bigtxbuf_virtual == NULL) {
>>> status = -ENOMEM;
>>> goto out;
>>> }
>>> bigrxbuf_virtual = kmalloc(DMA_TEST_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
>>>
>>>
>>> if kmalloc memory space for bigrxbuf_virtual is NULL, when it have
>>> kmalloc DMA_TEST_SIZE memory space for bigtxbuf_virtual,so ,if kmalloc
>>> memory for bigtxbuf_virtual success and kmalloc memory for
>>> bigrxbuf_virtual faild,i think we must kfree bigtxbuf_virtual memory
>>
>> Ha, I also misread tx for rx, sorry.
>
> I've just looked again, and the original version did have rx in the test. We
> weren't seeing things :)
>
>> Acked-by: Linus Walleij<linus.walleij@...ricsson.com>
>
> Acked-by: Nigel Cunningham <nigel@...onice.net>
>
> Regards,
>
> Nigel
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists