| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20100508143213.GB30514@localhost> Date: Sat, 8 May 2010 16:32:13 +0200 From: Nils Radtke <lkml@...nk-Future.de> To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Cc: "Jan Evert van Grootheest (SDG)" <j.e.van.grootheest@...way.nl>, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch> Subject: Re: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference, i915_gem_object_move_to_active Hi, This might point to the same bug but seen from the process' perspective, it then contains additional info about hw and kernel versions/circumstances: http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/2/18/104 This report might actually be related (in fact, same notebook): http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/981318 Daniel, I'm not sure I got what you intended to tell me w/: > There's a test patch in that bz entry (the one that adds two BUG_ONs). > If you're hitting these, is rather likely that it's the same bug. bz entry? I can't tell whether it's this exact bug. And I'm unfortunately a bit limited in using the notebook to test and crash it, it's not mine and therefore not always there to play with, if you intended me to apply some patch and test whether the notebook will crash at the BUG_ON()s. Thanks, Nils -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists