[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100509104041.1186d5f1@schatten.dmk.lab>
Date: Sun, 9 May 2010 10:40:41 +0200
From: Florian Mickler <florian@...kler.org>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [RFC] get_maintainer.pl: only list maintainers by
default
On Sat, 08 May 2010 15:44:34 -0700
Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-05-08 at 23:39 +0200, florian@...kler.org wrote:
> > If scm meta-information is used, only list people that signed-off or
> > acked or reviewed the code in question.
> >
> > after all it's called get_maintainer.pl and not
> > get_random_people_to_look_at_the_code.pl
>
> Anyone that actually signs a patch is not "random".
>
I actually think that tested-by and reviewed-by is not "signing",
because it is not the person who does the "tag insertion".
it was one of the signed-off-by's who put the reviewed- and testet-tags
in there. presumably this is done in agreement with the mentioned
person.
And for facts, please check this out:
$ git log --since=1-year-ago | grep -Pi "(reported|tested)-by:.*@" \
| cut -f2- -d":" | sort | uniq | wc -l
1280
so i would say, these numbers (combied with your top ten which
accounts for only 318 signatures ) suggest that those mentioned with
these tag's are one-off bug reporters and not maintainers.
cheers,
Flo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists