[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100509224534X.fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Date: Sun, 9 May 2010 22:41:26 +0900
From: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>
To: konrad.wilk@...cle.com
Cc: fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, albert_herranz@...oo.es,
linux@...elenboom.it, chrisw@...s-sol.org,
Ian.Campbell@...citrix.com, jeremy@...p.org, dwmw2@...radead.org,
alex.williamson@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] swiotlb: Make swiotlb bookkeeping functions
visible in the header file.
On Wed, 7 Apr 2010 16:29:29 -0400
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com> wrote:
> We put the init, free, and functions dealing with the operations on
> the SWIOTLB buffer at the top of the header. Also we export some of the
> variables that are used by the dma_ops functions.
>
> Signed-off-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
> ---
> include/linux/swiotlb.h | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> lib/swiotlb.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
> 2 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
> +extern void swiotlb_full(struct device *dev, size_t size,
> + enum dma_data_direction dir, int do_panic);
> +
Please don't. You create a new IOMMU implementation with the helper
function. We don't want another IOMMU implementation that has broken
'overflow buffer' concept.
swiotlb-xen should handle DMA mapping errors properly instead of
calling swiotlb_full().
btw, if you try to push xen swiotlb stuff to mainline, please don't
put xen swiotlb stuff to include/linux/swiotlb.h.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists