linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH] Update the cachetlb.txt file WRT flush_dcache_page and update_mmu

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 10 May 2010 19:29:48 +0900
From:	Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>
To:	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
Cc:	FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>,
	linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com, benh@...nel.crashing.org,
	davem@...emloft.net, rmk@....linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] Update the cachetlb.txt file WRT flush_dcache_page and update_mmu_cache

On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 11:16:47AM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> In most situations, just doing flushing in set_pte_at() would suffice
> and flush_dcache_page() can be ignored. There are two situations where I
> still see flush_dcache_page() useful:
> 
>      1. SMP systems where the cache maintenance operations aren't
>         automatically broadcast in hardware
>      2. The kernel modifies a page cache page that is already mapped in
>         user space
> 
> (1) can be worked around on some architectures (though not sure about
> all of them).
> 
> Is (2) a valid scenario?
> 
get_user_pages() ?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/