[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1005091827500.3711@i5.linux-foundation.org>
Date: Sun, 9 May 2010 18:30:51 -0700 (PDT)
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
cc: Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] mm,migration: Fix race between shift_arg_pages and
rmap_walk by guaranteeing rmap_walk finds PTEs created within the temporary
stack
On Mon, 10 May 2010, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
>
> But, move_page_tables()'s failure is not a big problem.
Well, yes and no.
It's not a problem because it fails, but because it does the allocation.
Which means that we can't protect the thing with the (natural) anon_vma
locking.
> Considering cost, as Mel shows, "don't migrate apges in exec's stack" seems
> reasonable. But, I still doubt this check.
Well, I actually always liked Mel's patch, the one he calls "magic". I
think it's _less_ magic than the crazy "let's create another vma and
anon_vma chain just because migration has it's thumb up its ass".
So I never disliked that patch. I'm perfectly happy with a "don't migrate
these pages at all, because they are in a half-way state in the middle of
execve stack magic".
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists