[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201005101401.52182.arnd@arndb.de>
Date: Mon, 10 May 2010 14:01:51 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Takuya Yoshikawa <yoshikawa.takuya@....ntt.co.jp>
Cc: Takuya Yoshikawa <takuya.yoshikawa@...il.com>,
Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>, mtosatti@...hat.com,
agraf@...e.de, fernando@....ntt.co.jp, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
kvm-ppc@...r.kernel.org, kvm-ia64@...r.kernel.org,
tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com,
x86@...nel.org, benh@...nel.crashing.org, paulus@...ba.org,
linuxppc-dev@...abs.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH resend 8/12] asm-generic: bitops: introduce le bit offset macro
On Monday 10 May 2010, Takuya Yoshikawa wrote:
> (2010/05/06 22:38), Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Wednesday 05 May 2010, Takuya Yoshikawa wrote:
> >> There was a suggestion to propose set_le_bit_user() kind of macros.
> >> But what I thought was these have a constraint you two explained and seemed to be
> >> a little bit specific to some area, like KVM.
> >>
> >> So I decided to propose just the offset calculation macro.
> >
> > I'm not sure I understand how this macro is going to be used though.
> > If you are just using this in kernel space, that's fine, please go for
> > it.
>
> Yes, I'm just using in kernel space: qemu has its own endian related helpers.
>
> So if you allow us to place this macro in asm-generic/bitops/* it will help us.
No problem at all then. Thanks for the explanation.
Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists