linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v21 015/100] cgroup freezer: Update stale locking comments

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <201005102312.10190.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date:	Mon, 10 May 2010 23:12:10 +0200
From:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To:	Matt Helsley <matthltc@...ibm.com>
Cc:	Oren Laadan <orenl@...columbia.edu>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Serge Hallyn <serue@...ibm.com>,
	Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...nvz.org>,
	Cedric Le Goater <legoater@...e.fr>,
	Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com>,
	Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>,
	linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v21 015/100] cgroup freezer: Update stale locking comments

On Monday 10 May 2010, Matt Helsley wrote:
> On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 11:01:45PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Thursday 06 May 2010, Oren Laadan wrote:
> > > 
> > > On 05/06/2010 03:40 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > On Saturday 01 May 2010, Oren Laadan wrote:
> > > >> From: Matt Helsley <matthltc@...ibm.com>
> > > >>
> > > >> Update stale comments regarding locking order and add a little more detail
> > > >> so it's easier to follow the locking between the cgroup freezer and the
> > > >> power management freezer code.
> > > > 
> > > > I guess these three patches are for me.
> > > > 
> > > > Do you want me to handle them?
> > > 
> > > Yes, please, that would be great.
> > 
> > However, patches 16 and 17 seem to depend on checkpoint/restart and don't
> > appear to be margeable at this point.  Is this correct?
> 
> Strictly speaking they do not depend on checkpoint/restart. However, only
> checkpoint/restart uses the functionality introduced by those patches so I
> think you are correct that they aren't mergeable at this point.

OK, so I'm going to take patch 15 only for the upcoming merge window.

Thanks,
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/