[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100510223327.761015986@kvm.kroah.org>
Date: Mon, 10 May 2010 15:33:26 -0700
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...nel.org
Cc: stable-review@...nel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...e.de>
Subject: [115/117] [SCSI] Enable retries for SYNCRONIZE_CACHE commands to fix I/O error
2.6.33-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
------------------
From: Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>
commit c213e1407be6b04b144794399a91472e0ef92aec upstream.
Some arrays are giving I/O errors with ext3 filesystems when
SYNCHRONIZE_CACHE gets a UNIT_ATTENTION. What is happening is that
these commands have no retries, so the UNIT_ATTENTION causes the
barrier to fail. We should be enable retries here to clear any
transient error and allow the barrier to succeed.
Signed-off-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...e.de>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>
---
drivers/scsi/sd.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
--- a/drivers/scsi/sd.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/sd.c
@@ -1039,6 +1039,7 @@ static void sd_prepare_flush(struct requ
{
rq->cmd_type = REQ_TYPE_BLOCK_PC;
rq->timeout = SD_TIMEOUT;
+ rq->retries = SD_MAX_RETRIES;
rq->cmd[0] = SYNCHRONIZE_CACHE;
rq->cmd_len = 10;
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists