| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20100510223534.792925385@kvm.kroah.org>
Date: Mon, 10 May 2010 15:34:16 -0700
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...nel.org
Cc: stable-review@...nel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
NeilBrown <neilb@...e.de>
Subject: [04/98] md/raid5: fix previous patch.
2.6.32-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
------------------
From: NeilBrown <neilb@...e.de>
commit 6e3b96ed610e5a1838e62ddae9fa0c3463f235fa upstream.
Previous patch changes stripe and chunk_number to sector_t but
mistakenly did not update all of the divisions to use sector_dev().
This patch changes all the those divisions (actually the '%' operator)
to sector_div.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@...e.de>
Tested-by: Stefan Lippers-Hollmann <s.l-h@....de>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>
---
drivers/md/raid5.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++-----------------
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/md/raid5.c
+++ b/drivers/md/raid5.c
@@ -1649,7 +1649,7 @@ static sector_t raid5_compute_sector(rai
int previous, int *dd_idx,
struct stripe_head *sh)
{
- sector_t stripe;
+ sector_t stripe, stripe2;
sector_t chunk_number;
unsigned int chunk_offset;
int pd_idx, qd_idx;
@@ -1676,7 +1676,7 @@ static sector_t raid5_compute_sector(rai
*/
stripe = chunk_number;
*dd_idx = sector_div(stripe, data_disks);
-
+ stripe2 = stripe;
/*
* Select the parity disk based on the user selected algorithm.
*/
@@ -1688,21 +1688,21 @@ static sector_t raid5_compute_sector(rai
case 5:
switch (algorithm) {
case ALGORITHM_LEFT_ASYMMETRIC:
- pd_idx = data_disks - stripe % raid_disks;
+ pd_idx = data_disks - sector_div(stripe2, raid_disks);
if (*dd_idx >= pd_idx)
(*dd_idx)++;
break;
case ALGORITHM_RIGHT_ASYMMETRIC:
- pd_idx = stripe % raid_disks;
+ pd_idx = sector_div(stripe2, raid_disks);
if (*dd_idx >= pd_idx)
(*dd_idx)++;
break;
case ALGORITHM_LEFT_SYMMETRIC:
- pd_idx = data_disks - stripe % raid_disks;
+ pd_idx = data_disks - sector_div(stripe2, raid_disks);
*dd_idx = (pd_idx + 1 + *dd_idx) % raid_disks;
break;
case ALGORITHM_RIGHT_SYMMETRIC:
- pd_idx = stripe % raid_disks;
+ pd_idx = sector_div(stripe2, raid_disks);
*dd_idx = (pd_idx + 1 + *dd_idx) % raid_disks;
break;
case ALGORITHM_PARITY_0:
@@ -1722,7 +1722,7 @@ static sector_t raid5_compute_sector(rai
switch (algorithm) {
case ALGORITHM_LEFT_ASYMMETRIC:
- pd_idx = raid_disks - 1 - (stripe % raid_disks);
+ pd_idx = raid_disks - 1 - sector_div(stripe2, raid_disks);
qd_idx = pd_idx + 1;
if (pd_idx == raid_disks-1) {
(*dd_idx)++; /* Q D D D P */
@@ -1731,7 +1731,7 @@ static sector_t raid5_compute_sector(rai
(*dd_idx) += 2; /* D D P Q D */
break;
case ALGORITHM_RIGHT_ASYMMETRIC:
- pd_idx = stripe % raid_disks;
+ pd_idx = sector_div(stripe2, raid_disks);
qd_idx = pd_idx + 1;
if (pd_idx == raid_disks-1) {
(*dd_idx)++; /* Q D D D P */
@@ -1740,12 +1740,12 @@ static sector_t raid5_compute_sector(rai
(*dd_idx) += 2; /* D D P Q D */
break;
case ALGORITHM_LEFT_SYMMETRIC:
- pd_idx = raid_disks - 1 - (stripe % raid_disks);
+ pd_idx = raid_disks - 1 - sector_div(stripe2, raid_disks);
qd_idx = (pd_idx + 1) % raid_disks;
*dd_idx = (pd_idx + 2 + *dd_idx) % raid_disks;
break;
case ALGORITHM_RIGHT_SYMMETRIC:
- pd_idx = stripe % raid_disks;
+ pd_idx = sector_div(stripe2, raid_disks);
qd_idx = (pd_idx + 1) % raid_disks;
*dd_idx = (pd_idx + 2 + *dd_idx) % raid_disks;
break;
@@ -1764,7 +1764,7 @@ static sector_t raid5_compute_sector(rai
/* Exactly the same as RIGHT_ASYMMETRIC, but or
* of blocks for computing Q is different.
*/
- pd_idx = stripe % raid_disks;
+ pd_idx = sector_div(stripe2, raid_disks);
qd_idx = pd_idx + 1;
if (pd_idx == raid_disks-1) {
(*dd_idx)++; /* Q D D D P */
@@ -1779,7 +1779,8 @@ static sector_t raid5_compute_sector(rai
* D D D P Q rather than
* Q D D D P
*/
- pd_idx = raid_disks - 1 - ((stripe + 1) % raid_disks);
+ stripe2 += 1;
+ pd_idx = raid_disks - 1 - sector_div(stripe2, raid_disks);
qd_idx = pd_idx + 1;
if (pd_idx == raid_disks-1) {
(*dd_idx)++; /* Q D D D P */
@@ -1791,7 +1792,7 @@ static sector_t raid5_compute_sector(rai
case ALGORITHM_ROTATING_N_CONTINUE:
/* Same as left_symmetric but Q is before P */
- pd_idx = raid_disks - 1 - (stripe % raid_disks);
+ pd_idx = raid_disks - 1 - sector_div(stripe2, raid_disks);
qd_idx = (pd_idx + raid_disks - 1) % raid_disks;
*dd_idx = (pd_idx + 1 + *dd_idx) % raid_disks;
ddf_layout = 1;
@@ -1799,27 +1800,27 @@ static sector_t raid5_compute_sector(rai
case ALGORITHM_LEFT_ASYMMETRIC_6:
/* RAID5 left_asymmetric, with Q on last device */
- pd_idx = data_disks - stripe % (raid_disks-1);
+ pd_idx = data_disks - sector_div(stripe2, raid_disks-1);
if (*dd_idx >= pd_idx)
(*dd_idx)++;
qd_idx = raid_disks - 1;
break;
case ALGORITHM_RIGHT_ASYMMETRIC_6:
- pd_idx = stripe % (raid_disks-1);
+ pd_idx = sector_div(stripe2, raid_disks-1);
if (*dd_idx >= pd_idx)
(*dd_idx)++;
qd_idx = raid_disks - 1;
break;
case ALGORITHM_LEFT_SYMMETRIC_6:
- pd_idx = data_disks - stripe % (raid_disks-1);
+ pd_idx = data_disks - sector_div(stripe2, raid_disks-1);
*dd_idx = (pd_idx + 1 + *dd_idx) % (raid_disks-1);
qd_idx = raid_disks - 1;
break;
case ALGORITHM_RIGHT_SYMMETRIC_6:
- pd_idx = stripe % (raid_disks-1);
+ pd_idx = sector_div(stripe2, raid_disks-1);
*dd_idx = (pd_idx + 1 + *dd_idx) % (raid_disks-1);
qd_idx = raid_disks - 1;
break;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists