[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <z2z9929d2391005092213pa4bf9a5fx4c028167749a5497@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 9 May 2010 22:13:40 -0700
From: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
To: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
Cc: "Brandeburg, Jesse" <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>,
stable@...nel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, brandon@...p.org,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [stable] ixgbe: Fix return of invalid txq
On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 15:25, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com> wrote:
> On Mon, May 03, 2010 at 01:56:57PM -0700, Brandeburg, Jesse wrote:
>> Please consider commit fdd3d631cddad20ad9d3e1eb7dbf26825a8a121f for
>> inclusion in 2.6.32.y (it is already in 2.6.33.y)
>>
>> Here is the commit message, it fixes a panic on machines with a larger
>> number of cpus than ixgbe has tx queues (64).
>>
>> commit fdd3d631cddad20ad9d3e1eb7dbf26825a8a121f
>
> This doesn't apply at all on the .32-stable tree, as the logic has
> changed there. Care to properly backport it if you really need it
> there?
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
> --
Sorry Greg, I will work on getting you a patch against your stable
tree before tomorrow night.
--
Cheers,
Jeff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists