[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1005111107020.3711@i5.linux-foundation.org>
Date: Tue, 11 May 2010 11:17:34 -0700 (PDT)
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>
cc: Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [git pull request] ACPI patches for 2.6.34-rc6
On Tue, 11 May 2010, Matthew Garrett wrote:
>
> I see Windows write the SCI_EN bit without reading it first and without
> calling the ACPI enable SMM function.
Hmm. So presumably Windows doesn't even do them bit-by-bit, but simply
does a "restore PM1 Control register value" on resume.
And I guess it probably does the same for the PM1_ENABLE register and the
PM2 control registers too?
Just restoring the whole register values _does_ sound a lot simpler than
worrying about individual bits.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists