[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4BE9B8DD.9080004@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 11 May 2010 16:06:53 -0400
From: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...hat.com>
To: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
systemtap <systemtap@...rces.redhat.com>,
DLE <dle-develop@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ibm.com>,
Jim Keniston <jkenisto@...ibm.com>,
Jason Baron <jbaron@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -tip 1/5] [CLEANUP] kprobes: Remove redundant text_mutex
lock in optimize
Hi Mathieu,
Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> * Masami Hiramatsu (mhiramat@...hat.com) wrote:
>> Remove text_mutex locking in optimize_all_kprobes, because
>> that function doesn't modify text but just order optimization
>> to worker.
>
> Hi Masami,
>
> A few comments:
>
> 1) optimize_all_kprobes/unoptimize_all_kprobes should have comments saying that
> they are always called with kprobe_mutex held.
>
> 2) The sentence above in the changelog could be changed into:
>
> ..."because this function doesn't modify text. It simply queues optimizations
> for the kprobe_optimizer worker thread."
>
> 3)
>
> static DEFINE_MUTEX(kprobe_mutex); /* Protects kprobe_table */
>
> .. should also state that it protects optimizing_list.
>
Thanks! all comments are good to me!
Thank you again,
--
Masami Hiramatsu
e-mail: mhiramat@...hat.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists