[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100511223337.05945e68@linux.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 11 May 2010 22:33:37 +0100
From: Alan Cox <alan@...ux.intel.com>
To: Juergen Beisert <jbe@...gutronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
Subject: Re: Driver for a SmartCard interface on a SoC
> > I'd say drivers/char if its a generic char device, but if its MX25
> > specific code entirely then drivers/platform or arch/.../platform.
>
> This driver covers a SmartCard core built into this kind of CPU. Its
> not like an interrupt controller which is specific to the CPU. Its a
> component like the USB and LCD controller, also built into this CPU.
> Maybe other CPUs will follow that are also using this SmartCard core
> (I don't know, only the manufacture knows).
The question is really about the interface as seen from userspace - is
that generic or could it be generic so you could write other card
drivers for different hardware to the same user space interface ?
> > The other question is one of API - it's going to best if the API
> > isn't MX25 specific but could reasonably be expected to work with
> > other future devices. A fake tty interface is probably overkill for
> > that but it would be good to get general review of any API.
>
> "faky tty"?
Some systems have before now implemented onchip smart card interfaces
with drivers that pretend to be a serial port talking a serial link to
the smartcard.
Alan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists