[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100511031354.GA9327@kroah.com>
Date: Mon, 10 May 2010 20:13:54 -0700
From: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Ken Werner <ken.werner@....de>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, stable@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [stable] cpumask: fix compat getaffinity
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 10:47:03AM +0900, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> > How's this?
> >
> > cpumask: use nr_cpu_ids for printing and parsing cpumasks
> >
> > Commit a45185d2d "cpumask: convert kernel/compat.c" broke
> > libnuma, which abuses sched_getaffinity to find out NR_CPUS
> > in order to parse /sys/devices/system/node/node*/cpumap.
> >
> > However, the result now returned reflects nr_cpu_ids, and
> > cpumask_scnprintf et al. use nr_cpumask_bits which is NR_CPUS (for
> > CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK=n) or nr_cpu_ids (for
> > CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK=y).
> >
> > We should use nr_cpu_ids consistently.
> >
> > Reported-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> > Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
> > Cc: stable@...nel.org
>
> Well, This patch seems to have ABI change. please don't send abi-change to -stable.
Why? There is no such thing as a "stable" internal abi in the kernel,
and that includes the -stable kernel releases.
If it fixes a bug, that's all the requirement is.
> note: I'm not against this patch itself.
Great, then it should be just fine, right?
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists