[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100511232215.4c8b4318.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Tue, 11 May 2010 23:22:15 -0400
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: miaox@...fujitsu.com
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>, Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com>,
Lee Schermerhorn <lee.schermerhorn@...com>,
Linux-Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] cpuset,mm: fix no node to alloc memory when
changing cpuset's mems
On Wed, 12 May 2010 14:16:42 +0800 Miao Xie <miaox@...fujitsu.com> wrote:
> >> #include <linux/security.h>
> >> #include <linux/cpu.h>
> >> +#include <linux/cpuset.h>
> >> #include <linux/acct.h>
> >> #include <linux/tsacct_kern.h>
> >> #include <linux/file.h>
> >> @@ -1003,8 +1004,10 @@ NORET_TYPE void do_exit(long code)
> >>
> >> exit_notify(tsk, group_dead);
> >> #ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
> >> + task_lock(tsk);
> >> mpol_put(tsk->mempolicy);
> >> tsk->mempolicy = NULL;
> >> + task_unlock(tsk);
> >> #endif
> >> #ifdef CONFIG_FUTEX
> >> if (unlikely(current->pi_state_cache))
> >
> > Given that this function is already holding task_lock(tsk), this
> > didn't work very well.
>
> Sorry for replying late.
>
> Thanks for your patch that removes task_lock(tsk).
>
> I made this patch against the mainline tree, and do_exit() in the mainline tree
> doesn't hold task_lock(tsk), so I took task_lock(tsk). But I didn't take notice
> that do_exit() in the mmotm tree had been changed, and I made this mistake.
Ah, hang on. Yes, I had to manually fix that a lot of times. The code
you were patching has moved from do_exit() over to exit_mm(). AFACIT
my change is still OK though. Please carefully review latest -mm?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists