[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1273653045_3386@mail4.comsite.net>
Date: Wed, 12 May 2010 03:30:45 -0500
From: Milton Miller <miltonm@....com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
Cc: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: cpumask: fix compat getaffinity
At least for parsing, we need to allocate and parse NR_CPUS until
all places like arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/xics.c that compare a
user-supplied mask to CPUMASK_ALL are eliminated.
> Would it make sense to use my initial patch for -stable, which reverts
> the ABI back to before the change that caused the problem, but apply
> the correct fix (changing the ABI throughout) for future releases?
This would definitly be the conservative fix.
milton
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists