lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 12 May 2010 13:33:31 +0100
From:	David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To:	Michel Lespinasse <walken@...gle.com>
Cc:	dhowells@...hat.com,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Mike Waychison <mikew@...gle.com>,
	Suleiman Souhlal <suleiman@...gle.com>,
	Ying Han <yinghan@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/12] rwsem: wake queued readers when writer blocks on active read lock

Michel Lespinasse <walken@...gle.com> wrote:

> +	/* if there are no active locks, wake the front queued process(es) up.
> +	 *
> +	 * or if we're called from a failed down_write(), and there were
> +	 * already threads queued before us, and there are no active writers,
> +	 * the lock must be read owned; try to wake any read locks that were
> +	 * queued ahead of us. */

That looks weird.  Can I suggest rewriting it thus:

	/* If there are no active locks, wake the front queued process(es) up.
	 *
	 * Alternatively, if we're called from a failed down_write(), there
	 * were already threads queued before us and there are no active
	 * writers, the lock must be read owned; so we try to wake any read
	 * locks that were queued ahead of us. */

David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists