linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH/RFC] Have sane default values for cpusets

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1273674048.1626.117.camel@laptop>
Date:	Wed, 12 May 2010 16:20:48 +0200
From:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:	Dhaval Giani <dhaval.giani@...il.com>
Cc:	James Kosin <jkosin@...comgrp.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	menage@...gle.com, balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
	lennart@...ttering.net, jsafrane@...hat.com, tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC] Have sane default values for cpusets

On Wed, 2010-05-12 at 16:13 +0200, Dhaval Giani wrote:
> What you are saying is that an application
> programmer who wants to just use memory cgroups should also care about
> cpusets and just about countless other cgroup subsystems that can
> exist. 

That's exactly what he says if he mounts them together.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/