[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTimi3hZ_v8bKDcNPqXzTz2r9LputwmN47uhsLf6V@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 12 May 2010 14:28:34 -0400
From: Mike Frysinger <vapier.adi@...il.com>
To: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
Cc: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>, npiggin@...e.de,
marc@...silica.com, jw@...ix.com, cl@...ux.com,
penberg@...helsinki.fi, mpm@...enic.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
os@...ix.com, Michael.Hennerich@...log.com,
linux-input@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
dg@...ix.com, osw@...ix.com, rientjes@...gle.com,
dbrownell@...rs.sourceforge.net, grant.likely@...retlab.ca,
chris@...kel.net, Piet.Delaney@...silica.com
Subject: Re: [LKML] Re: [PATCH v3] ad7877: keep dma rx buffers in seperate
cache lines
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 14:11, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 10:37:05AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 01:28, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
>> > I guess that it would be better to start a new thread about this issue.
>>
>> will do
>
> In the mean time I will be applying the version of the patch with
> ___cacheline_aligned and buffers at the end, 'k?
i dont see a problem with it, and regardless of the route we choose to
go with kmalloc(), this change will be needed ...
-mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists