[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100511184900.8211b6f9.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Tue, 11 May 2010 18:49:00 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: miaox@...fujitsu.com
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>, Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com>,
Lee Schermerhorn <lee.schermerhorn@...com>,
Linux-Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] cpuset,mm: fix no node to alloc memory when
changing cpuset's mems
On Tue, 04 May 2010 18:54:02 +0800
Miao Xie <miaox@...fujitsu.com> wrote:
> Before applying this patch, cpuset updates task->mems_allowed and mempolicy by
> setting all new bits in the nodemask first, and clearing all old unallowed bits
> later. But in the way, the allocator may find that there is no node to alloc
> memory.
>
> The reason is that cpuset rebinds the task's mempolicy, it cleans the nodes which
> the allocater can alloc pages on, for example:
> (mpol: mempolicy)
> task1 task1's mpol task2
> alloc page 1
> alloc on node0? NO 1
> 1 change mems from 1 to 0
> 1 rebind task1's mpol
> 0-1 set new bits
> 0 clear disallowed bits
> alloc on node1? NO 0
> ...
> can't alloc page
> goto oom
>
> This patch fixes this problem by expanding the nodes range first(set newly
> allowed bits) and shrink it lazily(clear newly disallowed bits). So we use a
> variable to tell the write-side task that read-side task is reading nodemask,
> and the write-side task clears newly disallowed nodes after read-side task ends
> the current memory allocation.
>
>
> ...
>
> --- a/kernel/exit.c
> +++ b/kernel/exit.c
> @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
> #include <linux/key.h>
> #include <linux/security.h>
> #include <linux/cpu.h>
> +#include <linux/cpuset.h>
> #include <linux/acct.h>
> #include <linux/tsacct_kern.h>
> #include <linux/file.h>
> @@ -1003,8 +1004,10 @@ NORET_TYPE void do_exit(long code)
>
> exit_notify(tsk, group_dead);
> #ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
> + task_lock(tsk);
> mpol_put(tsk->mempolicy);
> tsk->mempolicy = NULL;
> + task_unlock(tsk);
> #endif
> #ifdef CONFIG_FUTEX
> if (unlikely(current->pi_state_cache))
Given that this function is already holding task_lock(tsk), this
didn't work very well.
Also, why was the inclusion of cpuset.h added? Nothing which this
patch adds appears to need it?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists