linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH/RFC] Have sane default values for cpusets

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <AANLkTimxO3xWmr8jgyiwsLNyqTJ-4OWJ4zNROC9SE7XH@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 12 May 2010 21:59:07 +0200
From:	Dhaval Giani <dhaval.giani@...il.com>
To:	Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com>
Cc:	balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, peterz@...radead.org,
	lennart@...ttering.net, jsafrane@...hat.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC] Have sane default values for cpusets

On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 9:36 PM, Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com> wrote:
> On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 12:29 PM, Dhaval Giani <dhaval.giani@...il.com> wrote:
>>> I think the idea is reasonable - the only way that I could see it
>>> breaking someone would be code that currently does something like:
>>>
>>> mkdir A
>>> mkdir B
>>> echo 1 > A/mem_exclusive
>>> echo 1 > B/mem_exclusive
>>> echo $mems_for_a > A/mems
>>> echo $mems_for_b > B/mems
>>>
>>> The attempts to set the mem_exclusive flags would fail, since A and B
>>> would both have all of the parent's mems.
>>>
>>
>> But would this not fail otherwise?
>>
>
> Assuming that mems_for_a and mems_for_b were disjoint, it would be
> fine currently.
>

Ah my bad. I misread mems_for_a as taking the value from the parent.
You are right, that was a case I missed.

Hmm, so how do we fix this? Any solutions? Not fixing the kernel
pushes the problem to the userspace, making it hard for tons of more
applications to use cgroups without jumping through a lot of hoops.

Dhaval
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/