[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4BEB3A77.1020907@zytor.com>
Date: Wed, 12 May 2010 16:32:07 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
CC: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@....com>,
Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>,
"Ostrovsky, Boris" <Boris.Ostrovsky@....com>,
"Herrmann3, Andreas" <Andreas.Herrmann3@....com>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"stable@...nel.org" <stable@...nel.org>, Jiri Benc <jbenc@...e.cz>,
Thomas Renninger <trenn@...e.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
"stable-review@...nel.org" <stable-review@...nel.org>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [stable] [113/197] x86, cacheinfo: Calculate L3 indices
On 05/12/2010 04:19 PM, Greg KH wrote:
>>
>> So if K8_NB has failed initializing for some reason, we never go near
>> the pci devs and the node_to_k8_nb_misc() calls since we effectively
>> disable the L3 functionality.
>>
>> Thus the NULL pointer checks you remove in the patch below are
>> superfluous, I agree, and I have already removed those in my tree along
>> with the other improvements/fixes I'm working on right now.
>
> So, was there ever a patch applied that fixed the bug that Jiri found in
> the stable kernels with this original patch that I could apply?
>
Sounds like this patch in -tip should be promoted to mainline/stable...
could the AMD people please confirm?
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists