[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1273641632.21352.107.camel@pasglop>
Date: Wed, 12 May 2010 15:20:32 +1000
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
tglx@...uxtronix.de, mingo@...e.hu, davem@...emloft.net,
lethal@...ux-sh.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/25] lmb: Introduce for_each_lmb() and new accessors,
and use it
On Mon, 2010-05-10 at 17:39 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > +#define for_each_lmb(lmb_type, region) \
> > + for (reg = lmb.lmb_type.regions; \
> > + region < (lmb.lmb_type.regions + lmb.lmb_type.cnt); \
> > + region++)
> > +
>
> Can you please make this:
>
> #define for_each_lmb(lmb_type, region, __iter) \
> for (__iter = lmb.lmb_type.regions; \
> region < (lmb.lmb_type.regions + lmb.lmb_type.cnt); \
> region++)
>
> so we do not have the iterator name hardcoded inside the macro body.
As a matter of fact, we didn't, but I made a typo on the first one:
- for (reg = lmb.lmb_type.regions; \
+ for (region = lmb.lmb_type.regions; \
region < (lmb.lmb_type.regions + lmb.lmb_type.cnt); \
region++)
I'll fix that in my series.
Cheers,
Ben.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists