linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ibft: Use IBFT_SIGN instead of open-coding the search string.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4BEB3F67.4050608@zytor.com>
Date:	Wed, 12 May 2010 16:53:11 -0700
From:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC:	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad@...nel.org>,
	Peter Jones <pjones@...hat.com>, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, gpxe-devel@...erboot.org,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ibft: Use IBFT_SIGN instead of open-coding the search
 string.

On 05/12/2010 12:33 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 12 May 2010 10:35:32 -0400
> Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad@...nel.org> wrote:
> 
>> Please also consider this patch with the others I've sent.
>> I've put this (and the other ones) on:
>>
>>  git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/konrad/ibft-2.6.git dev.ibft
> 
> Well, you're the maintainer and you have a git tree and I cannot tell
> the difference between an IBFT and a bar of soap.  So I suggest that
> you ask Stephen to permanently include your git tree in linux-next and
> send Linus a pull request in the 2.6.35-rc1 merge window like so many
> other people do?
> 

Either that or send it via Len Brown, since iBFT really is an ACPI
extension.

	-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/