linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -V7 3/9] vfs: Add name to file handle conversion support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87y6fo1fru.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date:	Thu, 13 May 2010 11:53:33 +0530
From:	"Aneesh Kumar K. V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
	Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@...cle.com>
Cc:	hch@...radead.org, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, adilger@....COM,
	corbet@....net, serue@...ibm.com, neilb@...e.de,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, sfrench@...ibm.com,
	philippe.deniel@....FR, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -V7 3/9] vfs: Add name to file handle conversion support

On Thu, 13 May 2010 10:20:38 +1000, Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com> wrote:
> On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 03:49:49PM -0600, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> > On 2010-05-12, at 09:50, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> > > +static long do_sys_name_to_handle(struct path *path,
> > > +			struct file_handle __user *ufh)
> > > +{
> > > +	if (handle_size <= f_handle.handle_size) {
> > > +		/* get the uuid */
> > > +		retval = sb->s_op->get_fsid(sb, &this_fs_id);
> > > +		if (!retval) {
> > > +			/*
> > > +			 * Now verify whether we get the same vfsmount
> > > +			 * if we lookup with uuid. In case we end up having
> > > +			 * same uuid for the multiple file systems. When doing
> > > +			 * uuid based lookup we would return the first one.So
> > > +			 * with name_to_handle if we don't find the same
> > > +			 * vfsmount with lookup return EOPNOTSUPP
> > > +			 */
> > > +			mnt = fs_get_vfsmount(current, &this_fs_id);
> > > +			if (mnt != path->mnt) {
> > > +				retval = -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > > +				mntput(mnt);
> > > +				goto err_free_out;
> > > +			}
> > 
> > I don't see that this does anything for us except add overhead.
> > This is no protection against mounting a second filesystem with
> > the same UUID after the handle is returned, since there is no
> > expiration for file handles.
> > 
> > At best I think we could start by changing the list-based UUID
> > lookup with a hash-based one, and when adding a duplicate UUID at
> > mount time start by printing out an error message to the console
> > in case of duplicated UUIDs, and maybe at some point in the future
> > this might cause the mount to fail (though I don't think we can
> > make that decision lightly or quickly).
> >
> > That moves the overhead to mount time instead of for each
> > name_to_handle() call (which would be brutal for a system with
> > many filesystems mounted).
> 
> That will pretty much match exactly what XFS already does.  Can we
> start by moving the XFS functionality (xfs_uuid_mount(), "nouuid"
> mount option, etc) to the VFS level and then optimise from there?
> 

I will do this. But should the uuid be unique in a system wide manner or
should it be unique for a mount namespace ? With containers isn't it
valid for the second container to mount a file system with same uuid of
a file system in the first container, but uuid itself is unique in the
second container ?

-aneesh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/