[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100513093232.9cd50baf.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Thu, 13 May 2010 09:32:32 +0900
From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] change direct call of spin_lock(anon_vma->lock) to
inline function
On Wed, 12 May 2010 13:41:18 -0400
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com> wrote:
> Subject: change direct call of spin_lock(anon_vma->lock) to inline function
>
> Subsitute a direct call of spin_lock(anon_vma->lock) with
> an inline function doing exactly the same.
>
> This makes it easier to do the substitution to the root
> anon_vma lock in a following patch.
>
> We will deal with the handful of special locks (nested,
> dec_and_lock, etc) separately.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
Acked-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists