[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100513075335.GD30110@core.coreip.homeip.net>
Date: Thu, 13 May 2010 00:53:35 -0700
From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
To: Mike Frysinger <vapier.adi@...il.com>
Cc: Daniel Glöckner <dg@...ix.com>,
Oskar Schirmer <os@...ix.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-input@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Oliver Schneidewind <osw@...ix.com>,
Michael Hennerich <michael.hennerich@...log.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ad7877: fix spi word size to 16 bit
On Fri, May 07, 2010 at 02:23:07PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 05:41, Daniel Glöckner wrote:
> > On 05/06/2010 08:26 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> >> i think it'd be a better idea to do something like:
> >> if (spi->bits_per_word != 16) {
> >> if (spi->bits_per_word) {
> >> dev_err(&spi->dev, "Invalid SPI settings; bits_per_word must be 16\n");
> >> return -EINVAL;
> >> }
> >> spi->bits_per_word = 16;
> >> spi_setup(spi);
> >> }
> >
> > There is no way to set bits_per_word using struct spi_board_info. The
> > description of that structure in spi.h explicitly lists the wordsize as
> > one of the parameters drivers should set themself in probe().
> >
> > Only struct bfin5xx_spi_chip allows to set this value in the board code.
>
> an obvious shortcoming in the SPI framework that should be fixed, but
> that doesnt make any difference to the above code now does it ? it'll
> operate correctly regardless of the SPI bus master.
So is the updated patch coming?
--
Dmitry
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists