[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100513083818.GA21924@elte.hu>
Date: Thu, 13 May 2010 10:38:18 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@...el.com>
Cc: greg@...ah.com, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Corey Ashford <cjashfor@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
"eranian@...il.com" <eranian@...il.com>,
"Gary.Mohr@...l.com" <Gary.Mohr@...l.com>,
"arjan@...ux.intel.com" <arjan@...ux.intel.com>,
"Zhang, Yanmin" <yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Russell King <rmk+kernel@....linux.org.uk>,
Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Maynard Johnson <mpjohn@...ibm.com>,
Carl Love <carll@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 3/9] perf: export registerred pmus via sysfs
* Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@...el.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-05-11 at 17:18 +0800, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > * Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> >
> > > The new PMUs will use a dynamic range that starts at PERF_TYPE_MAX.
> >
> > I dont think we should use a dynamic range of event sources - it's a
> > completely useless indirection that has no meaning to humans.
> >
> > As far as machine interfaces go a much cleaner approach would be to allow an
> > open fd to a sysfs file to be passed to sys_perf_event_open() - this would
> > identify the event source. This needs a small extension of the ABI but we
> > could thus get rid of the 'type' enumeration altogether and express _all_
> > event sources via fds to sysfs files.
>
> I still don't understand this sys_fd -> pmu lookup, would you please
> explain it more detail?
>
> struct pmu {
> kobject kobj;
> ...
> };
>
> What I can imagine is,
>
> 1. In userspace, sys_fd =
> open("/sys/devices/system/cpu/event_source", ..), then sys_fd is passed
> to sys_perf_event_open()
Yes, open() an event_source - or rather an event itself. For raw events there
has to be a separate event entry that can be opened.
I.e. we'd have a layout like:
/sys/devices/system/cpu/events/cycles/id
/sys/devices/system/cpu/events/instructions/id
/sys/devices/system/cpu/events/raw/id
By making each event category a directory we gain the flexibility of
integrating tracepoints as well, for example:
/sys/kernel/sched/events/wakeup/id
/sys/kernel/sched/events/wakeup/format
Where 'format' describes the event record layout:
# cat /debug/tracing/events/sched/sched_wakeup/format
name: sched_wakeup
ID: 59
format:
field:unsigned short common_type; offset:0; size:2; signed:0;
field:unsigned char common_flags; offset:2; size:1; signed:0;
field:unsigned char common_preempt_count; offset:3; size:1; signed:0;
field:int common_pid; offset:4; size:4; signed:1;
field:int common_lock_depth; offset:8; size:4; signed:1;
field:char comm[TASK_COMM_LEN]; offset:12; size:16; signed:1;
field:pid_t pid; offset:28; size:4; signed:1;
field:int prio; offset:32; size:4; signed:1;
field:int success; offset:36; size:4; signed:1;
field:int target_cpu; offset:40; size:4; signed:1;
print fmt: "comm=%s pid=%d prio=%d success=%d target_cpu=%03d", REC->comm, REC->pid, REC->prio, REC->success, REC->target_cpu
> 2. In kernel, sys_file = <find the sys file structure with sys_fd>
>
> 3. kobject = <retrieve the kobject from sys_file>
>
> 4. pmu = container_of(kobject, struct pmu, kobj)
>
> If my understanding is correct, then step 3 above seems strange. It's
> not the typical usage of sys file.
I dont think it's stange - we demux from the generic sysfs object to the more
specific perf events related object. This is similar how driver specific sysfs
functionality does the demux as well.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists