[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <s2l8d20b11a1005121812s2f071c06if3907763ab0789a7@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 12 May 2010 18:12:38 -0700
From: Michel Lespinasse <walken@...gle.com>
To: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Mike Waychison <mikew@...gle.com>,
Suleiman Souhlal <suleiman@...gle.com>,
Ying Han <yinghan@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/12] rwsem: consistently use adjustment variable
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 4:45 AM, David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com> wrote:
> From a human point of view, I would say keep woken, but use it to initialise
> adjustment:
>
> adjustment = woken * RWSEM_ACTIVE_READ_BIAS;
>
> and use it to initialise 'loop':
>
> for (loop = woken; loop > 0; loop--) {
Sounds good. I'll have it in next version.
(Arguably 'woken' might be confusing too given that we only wake the
threads later on. But I don't care much either way).
--
Michel "Walken" Lespinasse
A program is never fully debugged until the last user dies.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists